NAFTA, the Corn Coup

Page history last edited by TCDavis 1 mo ago
NAFTA: The Corn Coup
 
"Not only did [NAFTA] have an adverse affect on certain communities that saw jobs move down to Mexico but for example our agricultural section pretty much devastated a much less efficient Mexican farming system.  As a practical matter those are millions of people in Mexico who are displaced, many of whom now are moving up to the United States."
—Barack Obama, June 2008
 
The U.S. subsidizes agriculture with $20 billion each 
year compared to $3.5 billion in Mexico (NACLA, ‘08), enabling
large U.S. grain companies to sell corn at prices 30
percent below Mexico’s cost of production (LAWG, ‘05).
 
Given advanced technology, U.S. agribusiness can produce
corn at a much higher rate than Mexican family
farmers. While it takes the average Mexican farmer
17.8 days of labor to produce one ton of corn, it takes
the average U.S. grain company just 1.2 hours (IRC, ‘04).
 
The influx of cheap subsidized grains from the U.S to
Mexico under NAFTA resulted in the decimation of at
least two million farming jobs (IATP, ‘07). This number
does not include an estimated eight million farmers
who abandoned their land as subsidies, access to credit,
and a guaranteed product price were stripped away as
prerequisites for NAFTA’s implementation (ANEC, ‘08).
 
Two-thirds of the undocumented Mexicans currently
living in the U.S. (4.13 million people) came after
NAFTA’s implementation in 1994 (WP, ‘07).
 
The average number of Mexicans migrating to the U.S.
each year has increased from 28,000 to 500,000
since 1994—an upsurge of 1,686 percent (UIA, ‘09).
 
Every hour Mexico imports $1.5 million worth of food;
in that same hour 30 farmers migrate to the U.S. (AG, ‘08)
 
This article is reprinted by permission from the Witness  for Peace Mid-Atlantic Fall 2009 Newsletter.  For more information, go to www.witnessforpeace.org
 

 

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.